Dienstag, 27. November 2012

Guestlectures on sustainability and charity, two important aspects of Luxury Brand Management


Today we had two guest lectures, one about “sustainability and luxury brand management” and one about “charity and luxury”.

The presentation about sustainability was really interesting because not only common topics such as pollution and the right use of resources were raised but a wide picture of what sustainability means and what it includes was drawn.
Anette Lundbey (the guest speaker) made clear that “sustainability refers to the long-term maintenance of systems according to environmental, economic and social considerations” (Lundbey, 2012) and that those three factors cannot be separated but the picture has to be seen as a whole. She also explained that sustainability is a controversial topic especially because most humans struggle with thinking generations ahead (Lundbey, 2012). But as she said "we have to learn to think about generations ahead because without taking care of our environment there soon will not be an eco-system anymore, which means that there would not be an economy either" (Lundbey, 2012).
Some of her examples were very shocking and really made me think about the topic in more depth. When she was talking about 10 to 12 year old children, who are almost blind because they have stitched paper-thin textiles since they were little children (Lundbey, 2012) for example, this really opened my eyes. Instead of just seeing the beautiful sides of luxury we really have to start looking at what is on the other side of the coin, especially as future brand managers.
The way in which Nespresso developed their “ecolaboration” for example seemed to be exemplary as in order to get the best quality of coffee they incorporated with coffee farmers in Columbia, who promise to offer the highest standard of quality because in return Nespresso invests in their Businesses and trains them on how to use their resources efficiently (Lundbey, 2012).

The second guest speaker was Noor Al-Khillidar, the founder of the Iraqi Orphan Foundation in London. Because she was born in Iraq but was happily raised in the UK, enjoying the highest standards of technology and education, she had the feeling she wanted to give something back to her home country and therefore founded a charity to raise money for children in the Iraq.
To raise the money she organizes different events and collaborates with high end luxury brands such as Chanel who sometimes sponsor her events (Al-Khillidar, 2012). According to her, this is a win-win situation for both – for her as a sponsor because higher awareness can be raised for an event if big brands are involved, as well as for luxury brands as they can demonstrate their engagement in charity and therefore show corporate social responsibility (Al-Khillidar, 2012) .  

I personally think that charity events are a very controversial topic. Although they are a great way for collecting donations, which is the most important, people often donate money because of the wrong reasons such as prestige or social acceptance. Although this does not really matter as long as the money can be collected and reaches the ones who need it the most, I think charity events should be evaluated critically. Especially as a luxury brand you have to show that you are really committed to the charity you support because otherwise people will loose trust in you and your brand image might be affected negatively.

All in all both lectures were really interesting and relevant to the current luxury market.


References:

Lundbey, A. (27.11.2012). Sustainability and Luxury Brand Management. London: European Business School.

Al-Khillidar, N. (27.11.2012). Charity and Luxury Brands. London: European Business School. 

 

Dienstag, 13. November 2012

Digital PR - how important social media is for luxury brands


Today I would like to talk about a guest lecture we have had in class. The guest speaker, Matthew Zorpas, has its own Digital PR company, works as a brand consultant and is the creator of the famous blog, “thegentlemenblogger” (http://www.thegentlemanblogger.com/) in which he is talking about mens fashion and brands. To get an impression, simply watch the video shown in the link below.

Source: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPEbHam9mC4

What I thought was really interesting is that although he is working with luxury brands on a daily basis he is convinced that there is no right definition of what luxury is. As he said, although he is consulting big fashion brands like Gucci, every single one of his clients defines luxury differently. So instead of defining what luxury is, he just stated that in his opinion it is crucial for luxury brands to be creative and tell stories, no matter what they are about as long as they can create a dream (Zorpas, 2012). Furthermore within the context of storytelling luxury brands should never tell lies or promise anything they cannot offer because luxury consumers are very educated and demanding and will instantly realize wrong promises. (Zorpas, 2012)

Although Matthew was talking about luxury in general, the main message of his presentation was the importance of communicating directly with customers, especially through the use of social media such as Twitter, blogs, facebook and youtube. In his opinion Twitter is particularly interesting and effective because on Twitter luxury brands clients actively choose to follow you rather than you bombarding them with promotional emails or post. Furthermore the use of social media offers the brand the opportunity to receive feedback, listen to and directly interact with customers. In Matthews opinion the use of social media is not only a great opportunity for brands but has completely overtaken the role of public relations nowadays. Twitter in particular according to him is “the most influential media in terms of communications at the moment” (Zorpas, 2012) as it allows

·      personal branding
·      customers’ feedback
·      hiring people
·      direct traffic
·      reading news
·      networking
·      notifying customers
·      event updates
·      providing live coverage
·      seting up meetings
·      supporting your social media strategy (Zorpas, 2012).


Although I do agree with him on the importance of using social media as well as on it’s opportunities and advantages, I do think that classical PR still plays an important role in the luxury Business. In my opinion online PR and classical PR need to be combined and none of them should be neglected.  Furthermore in my opinion due to the restriction of words for tweets, it is hard to use Twitter effectively and to bring your message across. The pictures below show two tweets from luxury brands, one from Burberry and one from Christian Louboutin. The fact that Burberry for example tweeted an image which is not shown unless you click on the link in my opinion is not very practical and not many people will make this effort. Furthermore I think that hashtags in tweets like the one from Burberry are very disturbing because they make it hard to actually read tweets.


Source: Twitter (2012).


Furthermore it was really interesting, that Matthew mentioned the fact that many brands are still not really confident about using the Internet and ask him as a consultant whether they should go online. His reaction to this question was really strong as he said “If you question online – you are out of the game. You do not have a choice” (Zorpas, 2012). I think that he is quite right about this point because even if a brand decides not to sell online they do have to be present online. Especially as a luxury brand to make people trust you and become loyal customers, you have to be transparent, out there and tell your story.

So all in all I think, Matthews presentation provided very valuable information about social media although I disagree with him on the effectiveness of Twitter.



References: 

The gentlemen blogger (2012). Fashion blog. Available from: http://www.thegentlemanblogger.com/ (Accessed 13.11.2012)


Twitter (2012). Newsfeed. Available from: https://twitter.com/ (Accessed 24.11.2012) 

Youtube (2012). Matthew Zorpas Promo. Available from: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jPEbHam9mC4 (Accessed: 13.11.2012)

Zorpas, M. (13.11.2012). Presentation on luxury brands and social media. London: European Business School. 



Donnerstag, 8. November 2012

Service - the importance of CRM

Today we had another seminar on service, in particular we were talking about Customer Relationship Management (CRM) as well as about "complaining".

First of all I would like to talk about CRM, which I have learned is really, really important, no matter which industry you are in or which service you are offering. The main reason for the importance of CRM is the fact that it is much easier and cheaper to keep existing customers happy than to attract new ones (Harrison, 2012). Therefore maintaining good relationships with existing customers and trying to fulfil or even exceed their needs and wishes is crucial for being successful.

Although every customer is important, as a brand you have to make sure you segment your customers and treat them differently depending on their buying status. The framework shown in Figure 1 shows a way of doing so. 


Figure 1

Source: Harrison, J. (2012).


As you can see your client base can be divided into four (or more, depending on the strategy you are using) groups, rating customers from “poor relationship customers” to “good-relationship customers” (Harrison, 2012).

In this case four groups have been identified, which are explained below:

1. Platinum:
“The platinum clients constitute a very small percentage of the customer base, they do however contribute a large share to the firms profits.  They are not price sensitive but expect the highest service levels. They are the 20 percent of the population providing 80 percent of the sales.” (Harrison, 2012)

2. Gold:
“The gold tier has a larger number of clients than the platinum tier, they do however contribute less profit than the platinum clients. They are more price sensitive and slightly less committed to the brand.” (Harrison, 2012)

3. Iron:
“Iron customers provide a customer/client base and can give companies the economies of scale. Hence, they are often important so that a company can build and maintain a certain capacity level, particularly important in certain services such as hospitality. This is important for servicing platinum and gold tiers as well. They are only marginally profitable and may be called day trippers, they are only marginally profitable.” (Harrison, 2012)

4. Lead:
“Tend to generate low revenues, but require same level of service as the above group . The question is do we work on them through the obstacles to Luxury?”  (Harrison, 2012)


In my opinion the framework explained above is a great method of segmenting customers and implementing strategies to reach them. I am also very persuaded of this concept because we were using it in a company I have worked for and it proved to be very efficient and to the point. In this case we for example offered pre-launch events for “Platinum”- customers to make them feel special and maintain loyal and sent out gift cards with the slogan “Forget me not” to customers of the “Lead”-segment to further engage with them and make them become more loyal.

Another framework which we were talking about in class that is very interesting, is the one shown in Figure 2. It basically also shows the four different categories, explained above, but it also allows you to see the size of the different categories.

Figure 2
Source: Harrison, J. (2012).


So according to this framework, customers’ loyalty increases with the level of satisfaction of the service.
But although satisfied customers are more likely to become loyal it is also very, very important to deal with unsatisfied customers and to try to convince them of the service/brand (Harrison, 2012).

Therefore brands have to come up with strategies for “service recovery”, hence they have to decide on things such as return policies, responses to complains and compensation, having in mind why customers complain and what it is what they expect (Harrison, 2012). Furthermore as a brand it is crucial to train your staff so they know how to deal with complains. This is particularly important because, although customers might be upset about something, in my opinion a member of staff always has the possibility to change that perception and turn an unhappy customer into a happy and loyal customer.

To explain this in a bit more detail I will give a personal example of an experience I have had at a restaurant and club called “Bodo’s Schloss”, which opened in London a few weeks ago.
When I went to Bodo’s Schloss the first time, for their opening, I was absolutely amazed by the location as well as the service. Although the invitation said that dinner will be served till 10 pm we totally forgot about that and were really disappointed when we arrived and were told they do not serve food anymore. But what really impressed me was that they instantly offered to prepare a cold starter for us so we do not have to stay hungry all night long. This offer was amazing, especially because it was their opening night and they were really busy.
So, impressed by this service and the location, I booked a table for dinner a few weeks later because I had visitors from Germany and felt this was a great restaurant to take them to.
But the disappointment already started when we saw our table. Although I have booked a table for 8 people, we were offered a very, very small table, which in our opinion was designed for a maximum of five people. But in pleasant anticipation we did not complain, especially because we saw that all other tables were gone already and that even groups of 10 people were placed on tables with the size of ours.
When it came to the order my friends tried to make their order in German, just because it is an Austrian restaurant so we were expecting them to stick to their identity and hire staff which can also speak German. But they haven’t….So never mind we thought, let’s just order a few drinks. And we asked for “Radler”, which is an Austrian drink, a mixture between beer and lemonade. Although we could see the waitress has never heard of that drink, she pretended to know and came back with something completely different.
I do not have to say that the quality of the starter was a disaster, because by that time we already didn’t expect anything great anymore. After waiting for the main course for an hour, we were served in two groups so four of us had to wait another half an hour and started eating by the time the others were done with their main course.
By that time I already complained three times but the waitress did not even apologize.
After waiting one more hour for one Gin Tonic I asked to see the manager, who apologized and explained that the waitress just started working at Bodo’s Schloss, but she did not even offer any compensation. When I asked for compensation she offered a free shot for all of us, which I thought was really disappointing. I would have expected her to apologize to the whole table not only to me because I was the one who complained, to reduce the bill and to offer any kind of compensation without me asking for it.

So although I still like the location and the atmosphere and the main course was not too bad, I will never go there again because of the way in which we were treated by their staff. Furthermore I have spread a really negative word of mouth, because I was really disappointed by them and do not want my friends to go there and make the same experience. I could therefore be defined as a “Irate” type of complainer, hence someone that is likely to spread a negative word of mouth (Harrison, 2012). Especially because the restaurant is new, I would have understood there are still a few things to fix and I would have come back even after that night, but not after the staff has clearly shown that they do not even care about our satisfaction of their service.

So as I said before, good service has the power to change every bad experience - but bad service sticks to customers' minds and will make them stay away from your brand.


References:

Harrison, J. (06.11.2012). Seminar on “managing luxury brands”. London: European Business School.

Dienstag, 6. November 2012

Brand Extensions


Today we learned more about brand extensions, which in my opinion is very beneficial because “brand extension as a marketing strategy has become even more attractive in today’s environment where developing a new product costs a lot of money and can be time consuming” (Vukasovic, 2012).

A brand extension generally is “referred to as the strategy of using an established brand name for new products (goods or services)” (Lockhart & Ford, 2005). The greatest advantage of extending a brand probably is that brands can benefit from the reputation they already have and consumers are more likely to trust and buy the new product quickly as they relate it to the image of the umbrella brand. “This is particularly so when using an established brand to introduce a new product in a different product category” (Lockhart & Ford, 2005).  On the other hand “the greatest risk in the expansion of the brand is that there may be a fading of the original personality of the brand” (Vukasovic, 2012), when the brand extension does not meet the expectations of the customers.

A brand can be extended "horizontally or vertically" (Vukasovic, 2012) in four different ways, as shown in Figure 1.

The brand extension I have chosen for my assignment is horizontally, as I am suggesting a Private Jet Service for Four Seasons Hotels, which would be a completely new Business for them and can therefore be described as a “total expansion” as defined in Figure 1.


Figure 1

Source: Vukasovic (2012).


All in all I think that extending a brand generally is a great way to make the most of your reputation and save costs when you are trying to enter a new industry but it also has to be planned carefully and a great idea must stand behind it because nowadays nearly every brand is extending its business so we are lavished with all those brand extensions and therefore became more selective.


References:

Vukasovic, T. (2012). Searching for competitive advantage with the brand extension process. Journal of Product & Brand Management, Vol. 21 Iss: 7 pp. 492 – 498.

Lockhart, A. and Ford, E. (2005). How consumers evaluate brand extensions. Managing Intellectual Property, April Supplement, pp. 23-25.